Effectiveness of Centralistic and Decentralistic Education Financing Models

Authors

  • Nur Atika Alias Universitas Al-Amien Prenduan
  • Zian Salsabila Bidaula Universitas Al-Amien Prenduan

Keywords:

Education Financing; Centralized; Decentralized;

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of centralized and decentralized education financing in improving the quality of education. This study uses quantitative research methods with secondary data analysis from various sources. The results of the study indicate that decentralized education financing is more effective in improving the quality of education compared to centralized financing. This is due to the flexibility of budget management and greater community participation in decision making. However, centralized financing has advantages in terms of efficiency and uniformity of education standards. This study recommends the need for a combination of the two financing systems to achieve optimal education quality. Some types of centralized education financing models are the Faudation plan model , the power equalizing plan model , the model of choice and voucher plans , and the full state funding model . While the types of decentralized financing models include the Pure Fund Assistance Model, the Planning Basis Model, the Tax Guarantee Principal Planning Model, and the Diverse Funding Source Model.

References

R. I. Partini, S. Nurti, and F. Fadriati, “Analisis Dan Dampak Kebijakan Pendidikan Nasional Tentang Desentralisasi Pendidikan,” J. Rev. Pendidik. Dan Pengajaran JRPP, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 3332–3339, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.31004/jrpp.v6i4.22645.

Rifa Hanifa Mardhiyah, Sekar Nurul Fajriyah Aldriani, Febyana Chitta, and Muhamad Rizal Zulfikar, “Pentingnya Keterampilan Belajar di Abad 21 sebagai Tuntutan dalam Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia,” Lect. J. Pendidik., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 29–40, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.31849/lectura.v12i1.5813.

K. Shaleha and D. S. Panggabean, “Pengaruh Pembiayaan Pendidikan Terhadap Kualitas Pendidikan Di SD Siburbur Kabupaten Tapanuli,” Edumaniora J. Educ. Humanit., vol. 1, no. No. 3, 2022.

R. Erdayani, M. Afandi, and S. A. Afandi, “Analisis Kebijakan Desentralisasi Pendidikan Indonesia,” Minist. J. Birokrasi Dan Pemerintah. Drh., vol. 5, no. 3, Art. no. 3, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.15575/jbpd.v5i3.29265.

D. Sampaleng and B. Baharuddin, “Analisis Manfaat Perencanaan Pendidikan dalam Otonomi Daerah pada Pendidik dan Tenaga Kependidikan di Kecamatan Babela,” Al Qalam J. Ilm. Keagamaan Dan Kemasyarakatan, vol. 17, no. 2, Art. no. 2, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.35931/aq.v17i2.1953.

“UU No. 32 Tahun 2004,” Database Peraturan | JDIH BPK. Accessed: Oct. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: http://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/40768

A. Munir, “Manajemen Pembiayaan Pendidikan dalam Perspektif Islam,” -Tadib, vol. 8, no. 2, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.21111/at-tadib.v8i2.502.

Alif Basman, “Islamic Education Financing Models,” Lect. J. Islam. Educ. Stud., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 27–34, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.58355/lectures.v3i1.72.

B. E. Wardana, “Hambatan dan Harapan Pendidikan Islam di Era Digitalisasi,” Asian J. Appl. Educ. AJAE, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–8, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.55927/ajae.v1i1.1371.

H. M. Gaffar, “Manajemen Pendidikan Madrasah dan Otonomi Daerah,” vol. 7, 2012.

A. Masang, “Hakikat Pendidikan,” Al-Urwatul Wutsqa, vol. 1, no. No. 1, 2021.

B. L. V. Victory, “Kebijakan Standar Pembiayaan di SD Negeri 4 Dobo, Kecamatan Pulau-Pulau Aru, Maluku,” vol. 7, 2023.

M. Mesiono and R. Roslaeni, “Mode;-Model Pembiayaan Pendidikan (Analisis Efektifitas dan Efesiensi dalam Instusi Pendidikan),” J. Bilqolam Pendidik. Islam, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–18, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.51672/jbpi.v2i1.10.

S. Huda, M. Maliki, I. Sadali, and N. H. Murtafiah, “Analisi model-model Manajemen Pembiayaan Pendidikan dalam Meningkatkan kualitas lembaga Sekolah,” J. Manaj., vol. 01, no. 04, 2022.

D. P. Aulia and A. Effane, “Ruang Lingkup Desentralisasi Manajemen Pendidikan,” Karimah Tauhid, vol. 2, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.30997/karimahtauhid.v2i1.7708.

W. D. Lestari and A. Effane, “Desentralisasi Manajemen Sarana Prasarana,” Karimah Tauhid, vol. 2, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.30997/karimahtauhid.v2i1.7713.

M. Mesiono and R. Roslaeni, “Model-Model Pembiayaan Pendidikan (Analisis Efektivitas dan Efesiensi dalam Institut Pendidikan),” J. Bilqolam Pendidik. Islam, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–18, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.51672/jbpi.v2i1.10.

D. Setiawan, S. A. Aziz, and C. Hilman, “Pengembangan Social dan Pembangunan Pendidikan Berbasis Masyarakat,” J. Inov. Eval. Dan Pengemb. Pembelajaran JIEPP, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 74–84, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.54371/jiepp.v2i2.217.

Agus Salam, Metode Penelitian, 1st ed. Sumatra Barat: CV. Azka Pustaka, 2023.

Sugiyono, Metode penelitian kualitatif, kuantitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Cv. Alfabeta, 2016.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31

How to Cite

Nur Atika Alias, & Zian Salsabila Bidaula. (2024). Effectiveness of Centralistic and Decentralistic Education Financing Models. Journal of Education Policy Analysis, 2(2), 92–98. Retrieved from https://businessandfinanceanalyst.com/index.php/JEPA/article/view/362

Issue

Section

Articles