Implementation of the Direct Instruction Learning Model on 8th Grades Social Sciences Learning Outcomes at SMPN 2 Larangan
Abstract
This research aims to determine the implementation of the direct instruction learning model on the learning outcomes of grade 8 students at SMPN 2 Prohibition in social studies subjects and analyze the obstacles and solutions. This research uses a qualitative approach with the type of field research. The data sources obtained are based on the results of observations, interviews and documentation. Checking the validity of the data uses extended observations, as well as persistence of observations and triangulation. For data analysis, we used three techniques, namely checking data, organizing (grouping), conclusion drawing/verification (drawing conclusions). The research results show that at SMPN 2 Larangan the direct instruction learning model is implemented. In its application the teacher combines learning methods, such as; lecture, discussion and problem solving methods. Then, in implementing this direct instruction learning model, there are several obstacles. Among others; obstacles that exist for students and obstacles that exist for teachers. The obstacle for students is the difference in students' IQ levels so that the process of understanding the material takes quite a long time. Then the obstacles that exist for teachers include; (1) The teacher must understand the material in detail. (2) Teachers must be creative in choosing learning methods, taking into account that these methods must be appropriate to the learning material.
References
R. Rahayu, S. Iskandar, and Y. Abidin, “Inovasi Pembelajaran Abad 21 dan Penerapannya di Indonesia,” J. Basicedu, vol. 6, no. 2, 2022, doi: 10.31004/basicedu.v6i2.2082.
M. Laras, “Konsep perkembangan,” www.id.scrib.com, 2011. https://id.scribd.com/doc/7116343/konsep-perkembangan.
I. A. Nafrin and H. Hudaidah, “Perkembangan Pendidikan Indonesia di Masa Pandemi Covid-19,” EDUKATIF J. ILMU Pendidik., vol. 3, no. 2, 2021, doi: 10.31004/edukatif.v3i2.324.
M. Yamin, Strategi & Metode dalam Model Pemebalajaran. Jakarta: GP Press Group, 2013.
M. I. Sidik NH. and H. Winata, “MENINGKATKAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA MELALUI PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN DIRECT INSTRUCTION,” J. Pendidik. Manaj. Perkantoran, vol. 1, no. 1, 2016, doi: 10.17509/jpm.v1i1.3262.
N. M. Sueni, “Metode, Model dan Bentuk Model Pembelajaran,” Wacana Sar., vol. 19, no. 2, 2019.
Engel, “Macam - Macam Model Pembelajaran,” Pap. Knowl. . Towar. a Media Hist. Doc., 2014.
W. Yanti, “PENGGUNAAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN LANGSUNG (DIRECT INSTRUCTION) UNTUK MENINGKATKAN HASIL BELAJAR BIOLOGI SISWA KELAS X IPA 1 SMA NEGERI 15 KOTA TAKENGON TAHUN PELAJARAN 2018-2019,” Biot. J. Ilm. Biol. Teknol. dan Kependidikan, vol. 7, no. 2, 2019, doi: 10.22373/biotik.v7i2.5652.
K. K. Sasmoko, “Penerapan Pembelajaran Direct Instruction untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar IPA Ciri Ciri Makhluk Hidup Siswa Kelas III SDN Nguter 01,” J. Pendidik., vol. 30, no. 2, 2021, doi: 10.32585/jp.v30i2.1548.
A. Zendler and K. Klein, “The effect of direct instruction and web quest on learning outcome in computer science education,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 23, no. 6, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s10639-018-9740-4.
A. Setiawan, Y. Kharisma, and S. Yohan, “The Effect of Direct Instruction Learning Model on The Forearm Pass Learning Outcome in Volleyball,” J. Pendidik. Jasm. Dan Olahraga, vol. 5, no. 2, 2020.
A. Malik, A. Wandira, D. Kuntadi, and A. R. Nugraha, “How can interactive multimedia direct instruction model improve student cognitive learning outcomes?,” Momentum Phys. Educ. J., vol. 6, no. 2, 2022, doi: 10.21067/mpej.v6i2.6686.
M. Salam, N. Ibrahim, and M. Sukardjo, “Effects of instructional models and spatial intelligence on the mathematics learning outcomes after controlling for students’ initial competency,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 12, no. 3, 2019, doi: 10.29333/iji.2019.12342a.
S. Zulaihah and A. Rahmaniah, “PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN DIRECT INSTRUCTION UNTUK MENINGKATKAN MINAT DAN HASIL BELAJAR IPS,” Din. Sos. J. Pendidik. Ilmu Pengetah. Sos., vol. 2, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.18860/dsjpips.v2i1.2098.




